Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/To the Beat! Back 2 School

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Potential to recreate as a redirect if an article is created for the first film or the series. RL0919 (talk) 19:27, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

To the Beat! Back 2 School

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable film, and the content of the article is either straight up copyvio promo [1] or a cast list. Insufficient references to reliable sources. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 18:14, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 18:14, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: I found a sole CSM review, but that's not enough to justify an article. There's mildly enough coverage of the first film to where we could maybe justify an article on both films. (first film: CSM, Dove, Screen Daily) ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (｡◕‿◕｡) 19:58, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

When considering this, keep in mind that the article on the first film was deleted while it was still in production - it hadn't received any reviews yet. ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (｡◕‿◕｡) 19:59, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I concur with ReaderofthePack, remake into article about the series, maybe with significantly trimmed cast lists. To The Beat! should be restored to this end. It is 100% wrong that an AFD outcome in 2017 inhibits restoration if new sources are added to the restored article. Geschichte (talk) 09:12, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Agreed, a merge of these two articles seems like a good alternative to deletion. NemesisAT (talk) 09:51, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The first movie doesn't have a page, and nothing here to support this movie as notable as well. Deathlibrarian (talk) 09:00, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The first film does have an article but it was redirected. It had sources, it could be re-created if others wished. NemesisAT (talk) 09:11, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Nothing found in a BEFORE to support having an article. 16:18, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
Delete per nom. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 16:06, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.