Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Titus Pullo (Rome character)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Vorenus and Pullo. Closing as a redirect. Thanks everyone for participating and assuming good faith! Missvain (talk) 16:19, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Titus Pullo (Rome character)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. TTN (talk) 17:42, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. TTN (talk) 17:42, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. TTN (talk) 17:42, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 18:22, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Entertainment-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 18:22, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Vorenus and Pullo where the fictional version of this character is already mentioned. Aoba47 (talk) 19:12, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Vorenus and Pullo per Aoba47. The fictional characters are based on these. Would suggest a merge but everything that would be merged is there already so redirect and merge are functionally the same thing. — Sirfurboy (talk) 10:23, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Do not keep -- I cannot believe we need such a long article in a fictional character in a not very notable TV series. Redirect somewhere. An alternative might be to an article on the series or its characters. Peterkingiron (talk) 16:42, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.