Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Titan Growth

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 00:10, 8 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Titan Growth

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable SEO company. Citations are a mix of "fastest growing" lists, advertorials, business partner lists, etc. No significant coverage. Citations are peppered into the article to increase reference count, but rarely actually verify the facts cited. Borderline spam. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 17:31, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 17:32, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 17:32, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:10, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jenks24 (talk) 00:47, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: A WP:SPA article which was briefly in draft but then moved into mainspace without independent evaluation. Appearance on fastest-growing and best-places-to-work and award-finalist lists may be gratifying for a firm but do not point to encyclopaedic notability. The best of the references is probably the 4 paragraph "CIO Story" item but it lacks the substance needed for WP:CORPDEPTH. AllyD (talk) 08:18, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete References fail the criteria for establishing notability, topic fails GNG and WP:NCORP -- HighKing⁺⁺ 14:06, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.