Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Timothy Grayem

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 03:05, 14 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Timothy Grayem

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Per WP:CREATIVE: Non-notable book and film writing. Non-notable acting. No evidence of notability per WP:GNG. Green Cardamom (talk) 06:17, 28 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:23, 28 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:23, 28 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:23, 28 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:23, 28 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - We could redirect the article to one of the Chuck Norris movies but I don't know which and it probably wouldn't matter because they were small roles (aside from writing the story I suppose). Google News archives found results relevant to both Chuck Norris and his company but none of them seem to be sufficient to build a good article. Another search provided republished press releases for the company. The San Fernando Valley Buisness Journal and Santa Clarita Valley Business Journal are good but small mentions and thus also not much to build a good article even for the company instead of Tim Grayem. SwisterTwister talk 01:35, 3 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 02:35, 6 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, as doesn't come close to meeting criteria of WP:CREATIVE. Coretheapple (talk) 16:04, 9 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.