Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Timeline of significant non-sexualized public nudity activities
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep and move to Timeline of non-sexual public nudity. Listing on WP:CP since there's no indication that it's used with permission. - Bobet 13:32, 5 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Interesting article that might be encyclopedic, but not salvageable in it's current form. Possible copyvio of http://bodyfreedom.org/guide/timeline.html, although it is possible that the copyright is owned by the original editor User:Dandelion as part of the Body Freedom Collaborative. Lists several first-party sources as proof that these events occured, but no reliable third-party sources to show why these events are significant. Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate source of information, and the inclusion of 40-some Baring Witness style events from January to March 2003, as well as the founding of two Yahoo groups (?!), is clearly indiscriminate. -- NORTH talk 22:27, 25 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Unsure. If kept, it will need massive cleanup. Some on the list are pretty notable (the 1969 Denmark "wade-in", Burning Man) some are not "Terri Sue Webb Fountain incident in Portland". Possibly keep if majorly cleaned up. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 00:00, 26 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep but move as long as the copyright issues are addressed. The use of the term "significant" may also need addressing, since it reeks of POV, so I'd suggest moving to something like Timeline of non-sexual public nudity, which would cover a slightly wider topic area. But this could be a fairly interesting list - the ones mentioned by Andrew, for instance, and also the mass public photography shoots by ...um...can't remember his name, damn. A lot of things on this list shouldn't be, but a lot of other things should, relating to first nude appearances uncensored in mass media (e.g., the release of the Lennon-Ono "Two Virgins" album). Grutness...wha? 04:04, 26 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep but move as Grutness suggests Fastifex 08:38, 26 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.