Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Time of Eve

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. –Juliancolton ^Tropical ^Cyclone 00:30, 12 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Time of Eve

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There is no evidence that this is a notable series, and no assertion of notability. Given its relative youth and the fact that it is streamed I find it unlikely that it is in fact notable. TallNapoleon (talk) 05:40, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete unless citations from reliable sources are added to the article as required by the verifiability policy. Stifle (talk) 11:53, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Watch it. It's notable, with big name voice actors and big money budget. ~Ladholyman
- Comment: Can you provide some third-party references establishing notability? TallNapoleon (talk) 07:41, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  - http://gigazine.net/index.php?/news/comments/20080801_time_of_eve/ Gigazine's report on Time of Eve premiering in France.
  - http://www.rbbtoday.com/news/20080807/53415.html RBB Today's article about the show itself.
  - http://digitallife.jp.msn.com/article/article.aspx/genreid=111/articleid=345227/ RBB Today's article on the second episode streaming.
  - http://bb.watch.impress.co.jp/cda/news/23373.html Yahoo Animation Japan's news report. ~Ladholyman
Keep Relative youth is not a sign of non-notability. Streaming might be, but digital distribution in English by the parent company seems no less notable than a more traditional release. ANN coverage generally satisfies the third part reference requirements for anime articles. Doceirias (talk) 13:00, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral for the moment: That ANN's news division has noticed it is, as Doceirias notes, indicative of notability. I think part of the problem is that Wikipedia does not have clear guidelines for the notability of online broadcasts, as opposed to the older forms of air, cable, and satelite broadcasts. —Quasirandom (talk) 15:17, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Done by same staff as Pale Cocoon. edhoprima (talk) 09:29, 11 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.