Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tilhar railway station

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Withdrawn by nominator.. Star Mississippi 23:26, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Tilhar railway station

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

~~Lacks independent sources establishing that this is a notable railway station. MrsSnoozyTurtle 22:17, 5 September 2021 (UTC)~~[reply]

Withdrawn by nominator, due to WP:HEY. Regards, MrsSnoozyTurtle 22:54, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 22:44, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 22:44, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The Times of India report indicates that this is a regular railway station and we usually have articles about those. Also, I find historical sourcess indicating that there was a Tilhar station on the Oudh and Rohilkhand Railway back in the 19th century. So, there seems to be plenty of scope for expansion and improvements and so our policy WP:ATD applies, "If editing can improve the page, this should be done rather than deleting the page." Andrew🐉(talk) 08:19, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Andrew Davidson. The article is in sore need of cleanup, but it meets the notability guidelines for railroad stations. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 10:59, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. All railway stations are considered to be notable per longstanding consensus. -- Necrothesp (talk) 14:15, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, seems too early to delete it now considering it's 2-3 days old, there could be more room for expansion. While searching up might not get a lot of decent results in the first few pages, the article does include strong sources such as The Times of India and from Google Books. Thanks - RandomEditorAAA (talk) 15:52, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per WP:HEY. Improved significantly since nomination. NemesisAT (talk) 16:25, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.