Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tiis Holoni, Arizona

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 22:47, 6 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Tiis Holoni, Arizona

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I get nothing for this one except geoclickbait and a name on a topo map which mysteriously appears round about an intersection in the desert. It geolocates to a spot in an arroyo with nothing around it except a recently built church near a house, a few miles to the west. I'm guessing the anme may be Navaho but I have no idea what it might mean; in any case, there doesn't ever seem to have been anything here. Mangoe (talk) 20:23, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Arizona-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 20:43, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 22:24, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment the article starter should be notified on their talk page when the article is nominated for deletion. @Onel5969: Lightburst (talk) 22:28, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Zero results on newspapers.com, no Google results with "Navajo" or anything in Books either. First appeared on 1969 topo but not in 1982. Locale in the 1986 National Gazetteer. Reywas92^Talk 00:10, 29 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not a populated place so fails WP:GEOLAND Lightburst (talk) 03:09, 1 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete This seems to mean (with a bit of WP:SYNTH) "the place where cottonwood trees existed" in the Navajo language ([1], [2]). However I could find no sources other than maps.----Pontificalibus 12:55, 1 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.