Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tier Ethics

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. DS 04:56, 14 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Tier Ethics

Searching for "Mark Ballard" "tier ethics" is a google wack, only shows the wikipedia page; searching for "tier ethics" with google gives 53 hits, most of which use the concept in a different way that use in the article. -- Koffieyahoo 01:02, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Non-notable. Given the similarity between "Mark Ballard" and the user who created the article, "Mark Ball," is is likely a vanity entry. Ted 01:16, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, nn and vanity. Sdedeo (tips) 01:54, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per Sdedeo. —Khoikhoi 02:51, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, per nom. Also looks to be original research, possibly a hoax. Tychocat 03:08, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as original research. OhNoitsJamie^Talk 04:55, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete NN vanity. --Firsfron of Ronchester 05:49, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, per nom.24.27.202.53 16:50, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom as nn. Adambiswanger1 19:40, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete vanity -M^ask 20:40, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.