Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tie-up

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 18:20, 3 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Tie-up

Tie-up (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

As per wp is not WP:NOTDIC Wakowako (talk) 13:34, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment - The article obviously should not exist in its current state, but looking at its history, it looks like it was initially created as a redirect to the article on Affiliation (family law), back when that article was listed as just Affiliation. When that article was moved to its current title, and a disambiguation page was created at its former name, this redirect was never updated. It stayed that way until this morning, when the Redirect was removed to create this definition. My question is, was there a logical reason for that redirect to exist in the first place? If so, reverting it back to a redirect to the correct article would be best. If not, than it can probably be safely deleted. I will note that the term "tie-up" does not appear to be used in either Affiliation (family law) or Affiliation. Rorshacma (talk) 14:49, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 22:51, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.