Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thomas Butler of Cahir

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎ to Butler dynasty. ✗plicit 13:59, 23 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thomas Butler of Cahir

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Being listed in a genealogy doesn't confer notability. UtherSRG (talk) 11:47, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Royalty and nobility, and Ireland. UtherSRG (talk) 11:47, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge/redirect to Butler dynasty. Barnards.tar.gz (talk) 11:59, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect as this individual is not a notable member of the family. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mccapra (talk • contribs) 17:16, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Butler dynasty - per WP:GNG, WP:ANYBIO, WP:NOTGENEALOGY and WP:ATD. Subject has no independent notability. There are insufficient refs (both in the article and returned in my own WP:BEFORE) to support even the basic facts (birth/death/etc). And all we seem to be able to say about the subject is that they lived, had children and those children had children. A name being passed along. This is about as far below the notability bar as it is possible to get. Existence is not notability. I'm personally unsure what content there is to merge... Guliolopez (talk) 15:32, 17 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.