Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thittuvilai

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was withdrawn by nominator. [1] Enigma^msg 17:14, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thittuvilai (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete Article is all in a foreign language, replacing it with the Simple English version but rehauled is a good idea. Also unsourced. -- Hazax (talk) 23:05, 11 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Revert to a prior version before the current Tamil-language text was added. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 05:57, 12 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep; reverted per Metropolitan90. The source was to a local news website. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 12:51, 12 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep: An article about a village which has suffered in the past from wholesale non-English overwrites by new editors who may not have understood Wikipedia's language structure. I have added a reference which provides basic verification; meets WP:GEOLAND. AllyD (talk) 07:12, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per changes by LaundryPizza and AllyD. Other than the dam bit (of which I'm sure there'd be a ref) there doesn't seem anything in the simple english version that would seem a logical addition. Nosebagbear (talk) 09:30, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep thanks to the changes by editors above. PohranicniStraze (talk) 17:29, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.