Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thick Records

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 02:05, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thick Records (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

According to the label's own website: "Eerily Quiet Since 2007. We had a good run." Would appear to fail any or all of WP:NMUSIC, WP:CORPDEPTH and so on. Like it or not, for entities established established in the mid-1990s and onwards, WP:GNG amounts to a kind of internet beauty contest, and this otherwise handsome candidate appears have missed the reliable sources pageant. As always, please do prove me wrong. Pete AU aka Shirt58 (talk) 09:37, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 09:43, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 09:43, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 09:43, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment Was created in 2006, but wasn’t tagged for WP:NCOMPANY until October 2020.–Cupper52^Discuss! 11:24, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. Oaktree b (talk) 16:51, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• At worst merge to Music of Chicago#Rock. Geschichte (talk) 08:48, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Note from Thick Records owner Zak Einstein: Thick Records continues to operate as a catalog only record label. The information listed is current and accurate. THICK albums remain relevant and available online via streaming services Spotify, Apple Music, Amazon Music, Pandora, YouTube, et al. This Wikipedia page serves as a historical reference and reminder to newcomers that there is an existing record company called Thick Records. Please do not delete. 2603:8000:DA00:50C8:65DB:9EDF:6F6D:DF66 (talk) 18:18, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete I am unable to locate any significant coverage with in-depth information on the company and containing independent content, references to date fail the criteria for establishing notability, topic therefore fails GNG/WP:NCORP. HighKing⁺⁺ 22:21, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete non-notable label. I congratulate to the IP address though, for admitting that he is the owner. Many IPs who have a conflict of interest does not admit it. But anyways, the fact that they are present on Amazon Music, Youtube, Pandora and Spotify does not qualify them for a WP article. They are not reliable and anyone can have an account there. And just because they exist does not qualify them for an article either. People have to learn the existence of this label from somewhere else. GhostDestroyer100 (talk) 21:11, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.