Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Theaters in Birmingham, MI

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. CSD G12. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 21:52, 26 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Theaters in Birmingham, MI

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The page is a direct copy of the "source". Peppage ^tlk 13:06, 26 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Ecch. Cut-and-paste articles make me want to throw up. In any event, this is as non-notable as one can get. Perhaps the article about the Detroit suburb can list "the movie theatre with exclusive high back seats with custom Tempur-Pedic cushions" as one of the tourist attractions in Birmingham, Michigan. Mandsford (talk) 13:15, 26 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Even if notable, seems like it should be merged into another article. A separate article for this is just stupid. — Timneu22 · talk 13:38, 26 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Michigan-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:45, 26 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Nothing to go crazy about, just not a worthwhile article.--Milowent (talk) 19:16, 26 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete Why is this even here? It's a perfect candidate for a speedy delete? I mean, who would contest such a pile of crap that the creator calls an article? Who in their right mind would see this article as worthwhile? Mr. C.C.^{Hey yo!}_{I didn't do it!} 19:56, 26 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.