Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The three laws of web development

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy Delete by User:JesseW. ColourBurst 16:18, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The three laws of web development

Contested Prod. Somebody took Asimov's three laws and substituted "website" for "robot". Somebody apparently thought it worth repeating. I disagree. Author claims that knowing this "can single out professionals from hobbyists" which may be among the most ridiculous things I have ever seen posted here. Violates WP:NOR, WP:NEO, and it should just go away. Fan-1967 23:08, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Having attended the confrence i strongly disagree. the concept is sound.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Inventgeek (talk • contribs)

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment, or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you.

Soundness is not a Wikipedia criterion. No original research, on the other hand, is, and a websearch appears to show that this is a totally unknown concept. Wikipedia is not the appropriate place to try to launch a new concept. Please review WP:NOT. -- Fan-1967 23:17, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete it is a spoof, this joke has been bandied many times around the web dev community - and it aint funny no more. Moreover the source link leads to a web design company site which doesnt actually have any content related to the article. I mean that site fails on all of the 3 rules, looks awful and is back in the dark ages (who uses all flash sites now!!). Not that thats another reason to delete :-P --Errant Tmorton166^(Talk)(Review me) 23:20, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I fail to see any value at all in these statements. You could create infinite laws by merely substituting any object for the word "robot". But that's irrelevant to its inclusion in Wikipedia. There's simply nothing encyclopedic about this joke and it doesn't belong here. SuperMachine 23:29, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Tagged {{db-nonsense}} -Justin (koavf)·T·C·M 23:32, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per all above. --Kinu ^t/_c 23:42, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per nom -- Whpq 23:55, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.