Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The ten swords
Appearance
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. SNOW delete for unwritten first book DGG ( talk ) 03:06, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The ten swords (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
utterly non-notable project. No publisher, no designer, new author, written by a seventh-grader. Ironholds (talk) 14:04, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete: "OMG, I'm writing a book, let's put it on wikipedia!" With the sincere hope that the dream is accomplished, but delete we must for now.--Milowent (talk) 14:07, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:12, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Best wishes to Mr. Williams for future success, but delete this article for lack of notability, sourcing, and too much speculation on possible publishers, etc. Cnilep (talk) 15:36, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete - best wishes for the author to come back and add the article once he has published the book and it gains coverage.--Sodabottle (talk) 18:53, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.