Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Woman Who Died a Lot

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (Non-administrator closure)Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 20:33, 14 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The Woman Who Died a Lot

The Woman Who Died a Lot (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable book. No refs in article. Doesn't appear to have charted. Doesn't appear to have been reviewed in any of the usual places. Other books in this series have certainly charted, but not this one. Stuartyeates (talk) 22:32, 11 September 2014 (UTC) Withdraw per User:Tokyogirl79's work. Stuartyeates (talk) 20:10, 14 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 23:24, 11 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. — Ascii002Talk Contribs GuestBook 01:06, 12 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. I managed to find some reviews for the book, so it should pass notability guidelines now. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 06:02, 12 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Speedy Keep. TG is modest, she found seven reviews. Can the proposer withdraw his request? As it is, looking in the usual place was by itself more than sufficient to prove this book is notable. Over at amazon.com, there are 8 snippets of reviews for this book, including ones from Publishers Weekly, Booklist (starred review), and Library Journal (starred review). Choor monster (talk) 12:25, 12 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep After some good work by Tokyogirl79.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 19:09, 14 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.