Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The WEconomy Index

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:57, 11 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The WEconomy Index

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

May not meet notablity guidelines, with no categories, and no wikifies. 333 -blue 08:31, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:45, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:45, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, student projects are not notable Jimfbleak - talk to me? 07:57, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:25, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- pretty much no coverage whatsoever to indicate notability, even as a student project. GAB^Hello! 21:23, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - the WEconomy concept appears to be roughly similar to Sharing economy, but there is no indication this index is at all notable. The only independent ref predates the concept by years, and a search turned up no significant WP:RS coverage. Article was created by an SPA as possibly promotional. Dialectric (talk) 06:18, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.