Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Summit Lighthouse

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Church Universal and Triumphant. Sandstein 12:34, 3 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The Summit Lighthouse

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Heavily WP:PROMO with no independent references. I found some brief mentions: https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1525/nr.2004.8.2.28?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents https://www.jstor.org/stable/30034311?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents but this should be at most merged with Church_Universal_and_Triumphant Wqwt (talk) 22:04, 26 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Merge with the church. The title can redirect to the appropriate section. I cleaned up some of the promo language. – SJ + 20:36, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 04:43, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 04:43, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Washington, D.C.-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 04:43, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Merge. The topic itself is notable – doi:10.1163/9789004235977_011 is a 15+ page chapter in a scholarly book (published by a reputable academic publisher) on this group. However, it isn't really a separate group from Church Universal and Triumphant. This is the original name of the group (which however is still used by the group), the later is its newer name. Some scholarly sources prefer to use the former name, others the later, but they are talking about the same thing. (Maybe within the group, some distinction is still drawn between the two, but external sources generally either treat them as synonymous, or else treat the former as an earlier stage in the evolution of the later.) SJK (talk) 17:14, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.