Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Steal (film)
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn with no delete !votes. (non-admin closure) Ab207 (talk) 09:01, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- The Steal (film) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:SIGCOV, WP:NFO and WP:NFSOURCES. I did a WP:BEFORE and found a suitable and reliable review from Empire. Needs one more suitable and reliable review in order to be eligible. The Radio Times link doesn’t count because it’s a capsule review which is considered insufficient enough to fully establish notability per NFSOURCES. The Film Creator (talk) 18:18, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. The Film Creator (talk) 18:18, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
- Keep I found a second review and added it to the article. DonaldD23 talk to me 19:15, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
- Keep Review found above and additional sources out there to pass WP:GNG. The Independent, Evening Standard. WikiVirusC(talk) 19:31, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
- Last time I withdraw for the time being. I’m gonna take an indefinite break from nominating articles for deletion. The Film Creator (talk) 21:18, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.