Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Sims 3 Unleashed
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. BigDom (talk) 09:26, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The Sims 3 Unleashed
- The Sims 3 Unleashed (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
A bit too early for this one. No reliable sources. WP:CRYSTAL and all that. Catfish Jim & the soapdish 06:42, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) • Gene93k (talk) 15:20, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Article has three sentences. First flatly states the future existence is a rumor, the other two go on to state what will be in the pack as if it were fact. Textbook WP:CRYSTAL case, and the reason the guideline was established. Dennis Brown (talk) 16:07, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - We have a trailer [1] and that's it. Try again when there's something to write about. Marasmusine (talk) 10:11, 13 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - A singe mention in the main Sims 3 article is more than enough. When actual reliable sources are available, feel free to recreate the article. --79.166.235.16 (talk) 21:13, 17 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.