Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The ShareVantage
Appearance
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 02:30, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The ShareVantage (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Advertisement for non-notable company; PRODded by one editor (not me) and PROD seconded by another editor (also not me); PROD notice removed without explanation by article creator. TJRC (talk) 01:41, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - for reasons explained by TJRC. Wikispan (talk) 07:50, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions.
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.
- Delete per nomination. A web-based software service that apparently generates legal forms. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 15:51, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, this is a marketing attempt by a single-issue editor. Sources added to the article are not significant, and I have not found any significant coverage in reliable third-parties. Haakon (talk) 20:38, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Discuss, Hello. This article has been suggested for deletion a couple times now, and after reviewing the Wikipedia guidelines, I think I understand why. I have included additional external references, and I no longer believe the information can be mistaken for marketing documentation. That was never my intention, and I apologize if it came across that way. Are there any problems with the article in its current state? Another question: Why is this article less notable than "ShareFile"?
Coloradorocket (talk) 20:39, 19 August 2010 (UTC)Coloradorocket[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.