Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Reporter (film)
Appearance
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. The consensus is that there is insufficient coverage of this film in reliable sources to confer notability. Mkativerata (talk) 18:27, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The Reporter (film) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Student movie, not notable. Author has been doing this before Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The last shot (2010 film) CanadianLinuxUser (talk) 16:34, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:44, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. As I have said with The Last Shot and The Last Shot 2, the film is notable. With the other articles, they had IMDB pages and links posted to the front of the article. At this time, IMDB is going over the page for this film. — Preceding unsigned comment added by N easter12345 (talk • contribs) 23:40, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Again, the most IMDB can do for this film is confirm its existance, just as does the film itself. What is required for notability is to have articles about the film in reliable sources or better... being able to show the film has won notable awards. Please review WP:TOOSOON#Films and the essay "Newcomer's guide to guidelines" Regards, Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 05:10, 12 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:TOOSOON. While happy to congratulate these high school filmmakers for their creative efforts, high school films by student filmmakers rarely achieve the coverage required to meet inclusion criteria. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 05:10, 12 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete for lack of evidence supporting notability. IMDB can confirm existance, which no one disputes - but we need to meet the requirements at WP:N to keep the article. UltraExactZZ Said ~ Did 15:25, 12 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.