Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Purple Haze Estate Family

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete per WP:G11 by RHaworth. (non-admin closure) ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 12:53, 4 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Purple Haze Estate Family

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Cannot find any reliable sources that indicates the website is notable. Fails WP:WEBCRIT and WP:GNG. -- LuK3 (Talk) 21:28, 26 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 18:20, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 18:20, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Per nom, fails WP:GNG. EricSerge (talk) 18:50, 30 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Theo polisme 20:06, 1 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Lacks reliable sources. --Sue Rangell ✍ ✉ 21:17, 2 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Tagged as G11 - Rather than voting and relisting, the users above should have noticed that the article read more like an advertisement and was enough to pass CSD #G11. A glance at the website suggests this is a forum where users can share photos and apparently offers adult content as well. SwisterTwister talk 20:44, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.