Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Poke

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Thine Antique Pen (talk) 17:36, 28 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Poke

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Very short article about a not particularly popular website. Dubious notability (WP:NN). Donkey1989 (talk) 19:37, 22 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. I may be the author of the article, but you only have to read the notability guidelines properly to see that The Poke is an entirely notable website - sources on the article include The Guardian & The Telegraph. There's no valid reason why the article should be deleted.--SUFC Boy 20:07, 22 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Tentative keep - as the person above notes, there is no doubt the video of Clegg's apology set to music has received multiple third-party reliable-source coverage. Whether this article is the place for it, I am not sure. JoshuSasori (talk) 23:56, 22 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep, a couple of refs on the website, rather than its content would help Widefox; talk 11:30, 26 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:43, 27 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep fairly well-referenced from reliable sources. Paul MacDermott (talk) 22:10, 27 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.