Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Muppet Show Theme

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to The Muppet Show. (non-admin closure) czar  22:08, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The Muppet Show Theme (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

THis article was created on 26 September 2011 with no coincidence that the band OK Go released their single "cover" of that song on that date. WP:PROMO, WP:AD. This adds very little over what is already at the main article The Muppet Show except for the WP:PROMO. I have removed the PROMO under WP:BRD but seems to me fairly obvious if the article was created in the same week as the single was released, it is WP:PROMO. A single by a relatively new band is not in itself notable. Si Trew (talk) 22:36, 20 February 2014 (UTC) Si Trew (talk) 22:36, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 22:46, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The reference (155 at time of writing) at OK Go's article is to the "Webby Awards":
  • "Viral". "Webby Awards". 2012. Retrieved 20 February 2014.
That itself is a non-notable reference since it constantly changes and the specific content is not listed there, although mentioned there. The same reference was also at this article I propose for deletion, because I deleted it as not WP:RS and to take it to WP:BRD, but since nobody ever these days takes time to look at talk pages of articles I bring it here swiftly (or am I being too cynical? I leave loads of comments on articles' talk pages and have never had a response to any unless I have invoked process). I forgot, as usual, I probably should have let it pass rather than actually check references.
I could be wrong but I didn't think a "viral" reference via online sources counted as WP:RS, but I am happy to change my opinion if I am wrong. I have no doubt the band itself is notable (seems to be anyway) but this cover version of itself isn't. Si Trew (talk) 22:53, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I am not doubting that OK Go are notable, only that a cover version of a single which is a promo article on the week the single was released, is not notable. Si Trew (talk) 23:03, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Merge. On reflection, this should be merged into The Muppet Show as a separate section, and OK Go can have their place in that section without being (as I see it) WP:UNDUE. I would take this out of AfD and do a {{proposed merge}}, but having brought it here I don't want to pull the rug from other editors' feet, so will leave it here while it is being discussed. Si Trew (talk) 08:39, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:18, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.