Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Mirimar Disaster

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete --JForget 00:41, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Mirimar Disaster (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

A band, seemingly NN, and probably just a vanity/ad article. Jmlk17 08:34, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak delete. If we go by WP:MUSIC, the group is close to being notable enough for inclusion, but is not there yet. --Blanchardb-Me^MyEars_MyMouth-timed 09:03, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy delete A7. No assertion of notability and based on what I could find nor will there ever be. I won't tag for speedy though as the nominator removed the previous db tag before nominating it. EconomicsGuy 09:49, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy delete - band website and myspace profiles are hardly reliable sources. — Rudget _{contributions} 13:08, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Fails WP:MUSIC. Twenty Years 15:53, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as failing WP:MUSIC, but people need to realise that if Kerrang! magazine gave a band's album 4/5 in a review, then A7 should not be applied. There is at least an assertion of notability.--h i s ^{s p a c e} _{r e s e a r c h} 12:18, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.