Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Lovell Chronicle
Appearance
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Courcelles 00:01, 9 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The Lovell Chronicle (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non notable local newspaper FiachraByrne (talk) 11:14, 25 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep A 105 year old newspaper serving 5 towns; wp:notability is probably establishable, but not yet in the article due to it being so new. Content is brief and encyclopedic/informative. North8000 (talk) 11:45, 25 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of News-related deletion discussions. —• Gene93k (talk) 16:24, 26 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wyoming-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 16:24, 26 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:57, 1 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak keep It's a brief article, however appears to be notable according to a Google search. 11coolguy12 (talk) 10:56, 1 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - It's also referenced in Mondo Times here, although this is just a directory listing. However, the article has merit for its historical context. Northamerica1000 (talk) 22:31, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.