Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Loud: Around the Time

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete (G3) as a blatant hoax. --MuZemike 22:56, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The Loud: Around the Time (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence this film exists, absolutely no coverage BOVINEBOY2008 13:02, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - was unable to find anything online that, a) was not created in past few days, b) could not have been created by just one random person or c) had any smidgen of coverage anywhere. Theopolisme _TALK 13:07, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This movie, and not well known but what really has imdb, should not be excluded. we hope to make the imdb.--Keys Love (talk) 13:45, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:01, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, Fake relation with Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Dari Feitosa and pt:Especial:Contribuições/Natalia_Cannes. GRS73 (talk) 21:09, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keys Love is sock, check pt:Categoria:!Fantoches de Dari Feitosa. GRS73 (talk) 21:14, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Fails WP:HOAX. - Presidentman talk · contribs Random Picture of the Day (Talkback) 22:07, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as hoax. Not a single reliable reference: the article's link to IMDb doesn't find it, the link to Box Office Mojo is a deadlink; it is supposed to release in November, but the IMDb entries for Chris Rock and Danny Glover, the supposed director and producer, do not mention it. Pull the other one. JohnCD (talk) 22:13, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy delete as hoax. --Rob Sinden (talk) 08:26, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete; appears to be a hoax at worst, and non-notable at best.  dalahäst ^{(let's talk!)} 22:50, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.