Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The London Weekly
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 01:54, 26 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The London Weekly (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:GNG. The article is unsourced except for a link to the subject website. Almost all of the material in the article is unsupported, even by the subject's website. If you look at the About Us of The London Weekly, it links to Wikipedia. Finally, if you look at the bylines of the news stories, all of them are written by "Administrator". Bbb23 (talk) 16:46, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Not notable, and not to be confused with the free newspaper that should really have its article at this title. --Michig (talk) 18:33, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of News-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:05, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:05, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Theopolisme 04:11, 25 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as lacking indepth coverage in reliable third party sources. If such sources get added to the article, feel free to ping my talk page. 05:27, 25 November 2012 (UTC) Stuartyeates (talk) 07:08, 25 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.