Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Judges (demogroup)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Spartaz ^Humbug! 22:11, 30 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The Judges (demogroup)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable group. Λeternus ^(talk) 10:50, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. I feel notability has been established. If you look at [1], The Judges are among the top-15 rating demo groups, and the (one of two) earliest. --Frodet (talk) 22:40, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Only reliable sources can establish notability at Wikipedia. --Λeternus ^(talk) 07:20, 5 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please give feedback on which of the sources I have edited in are not reliable. --Frodet (talk) 21:08, 5 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure any of the sources in the article qualify as reliable, per WP:RS. Also, The Judges are only mentioned in passing, which is not enough to establish their notability in Wikipedia per WP:N. --Λeternus ^(talk) 11:00, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:57, 5 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:57, 5 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:57, 5 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:57, 5 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

They are mentioned on a number of pages of this book. I suggest they are at least a plausible redirect to Demoscene, Demogroup or some related article. James500 (talk) 10:09, 7 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Also see [2] from 23:40. --Frodet (talk) 10:59, 7 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - this demoscenen nonsense must be terminated from wikipedia. noone gives a damn about those hippies 62.143.156.22 (talk) 22:01, 11 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Ok it seems this list is getting out of date very fast: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Viznut/Deletionist_attacks_against_demoscene_articles Numtek (talk) 03:03, 12 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:41, 13 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as they are noted as early C64 demoscene pioneers as supported by reliable sources. // Liftarn (talk)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:23, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete without prejudice - There may be pre-internet sources out there but given they only existed a couple years, I doubt it. ~KvnG 16:33, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Notability is not temporary. --do ncr am 16:05, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.