Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Hundred (Star Trek)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. If someone would like to merge it, let me know and I'll userfy for you.. - Philippe 14:48, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Hundred (Star Trek) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

A plot element in Star Trek: Deep Space Nine. Not a character, not an episode: a plot element. As we have articles on ALL Deep Space Nine episodes, an article on Changeling (Star Trek) (the race) and an article on Odo (Star Trek) (one of three known Changelings, and the only one shown more than in one episode), the topic of this article is adequately addressed elsewhere. Prodded on April 8, removed by 76.111.31.190 on April 11 without explanation (that is the only edit so far by that IP).

(Text above in text messaging style: "nn plot element")

Jobjörn (talk) 00:07, 12 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. (However, the Female Changeling appeared in lots of episodes.) Clarityfiend (talk) 00:56, 12 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Duly noted. Jobjörn (talk) 09:24, 12 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Agree on all points; no reason it should not be deleted. TheNobleSith (talk) 02:25, 12 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Non-Notable.--RyRy5 ^{Got something to say?} 04:56, 12 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge with Changeling (Star Trek). Not notable enough to be its own article, but its an appropriate subcategory for the Changeling article. 23skidoo (talk) 06:16, 12 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge per above. -mattbuck (Talk) 22:04, 12 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 23:52, 12 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as unsourced plot summary. --EEMIV (talk) 06:24, 13 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, article on a fictional subject with no evidence of real-world notability. Terraxos (talk) 00:36, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.