Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Ganzfeld (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 13:26, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The Ganzfeld (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence this was a notable art magazine. Reference one might establish notability for the founders, but it's not sufficiently in depth to establish notability. Note: lots of false ghits due to the science term & associated publication. StarM 00:25, 17 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. StarM 00:25, 17 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. StarM 00:25, 17 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nomination. Jmill1806 (talk) 00:38, 18 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.