Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Fling (band) (2nd nomination)
Appearance
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:31, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The Fling (band)
AfDs for this article:
- The Fling (band) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Procedural nomination. The previous AfD was closed as "delete," but the subsequent deletion review demands a relist. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:37, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Still seems to lack sufficient sourcing to establis notability. /Blaxthos ( t / c ) 05:45, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - I said this before but got no response. One of the criteria for meeting notability standards was that a member of the group was a part of another notable band. One of the members was in Letter Kills. They have a wikipedia page with a link to The Fling. Also The Fling has been mentioned in multiple third party sources. With two on the page already and more to come. Blue Gillian (talk) 08:29, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep based on label and member from a previous notable band. GtstrickyTalk or C 14:25, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak Keep I don't have any idea who any of them are and I think the articles both need work (expanding and such) and I don't totally understand the rationale behind some of the notability criteria (if one member was in a different notable band than... etc - only because I can see some nightmares (I'm thinking Pete Best and any band he played with) but, it does appear they meet the criteria as written. Jasynnash2 (talk) 16:30, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- 'Delete. Local band with no full length albums and a tenuous connection to a minor band with an article. Gamaliel (talk) 22:58, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment References have been updated and the article has been expanded.Blue Gillian (talk) 20:42, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.