Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Flail from Heaven

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Wrong forum. AfD is not for merger proposals, and the RfC invoked by the nominator was about "controversial or contested cases of blanking and redirecting", not mergers. Sandstein 11:18, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The Flail from Heaven

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I'm proposing a merge of these three tagged articles (and, presumably, other Grimm Fairy Tales not listed in the "Notable Tales" section of {{Brothers Grimm}}) into a new list article (presumptively List of Grimms' Fairy Tales), similar to what I've been doing with List of defunct Drum Corps International member corps. (It would be split for size if necessary.) User:力 (power~enwiki, π, ν) 18:17, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. User:力 (power~enwiki, π, ν) 18:17, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. User:力 (power~enwiki, π, ν) 18:17, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I am also nominating the following related pages:

Keep (procedural), wrong forum, nominator wants to merge these articles not delete them so should go thru WP:MERGE procedures. Btw, if these were up for the deletion i would say "keep" as meeting no. 5 of WP:NBOOK as Grimm bros. are "so historically significant that any of the author's written works may be considered notable" (ditto, opposed to any merging). Coolabahapple (talk) 01:04, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- I may be misinterpreting [1] this discussion. Also, to a certain extent, I do want to demonstrate consensus these pages should not be deleted outright. User:力 (power~enwiki, π, ν) 01:16, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Merge per the nominator. While normally I'd go with this notable because the author has historical significance, I can see where things would get extremely obtuse and junky if there are separate (probably trivial) articles for every single short story an author, historical or not, writes. So I think a merge is warranted in this case IMO. --Adamant1 (talk) 04:57, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.