Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Fight For Bala (film)

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Nakon 02:28, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The Fight For Bala (film)

The Fight For Bala (film) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable film lacking non-trivial support. Mentions are passing in nature, very little about the movie. reddogsix (talk) 01:13, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Everymorning talk 01:25, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Soft Delete To the contrary of the nominator's statement, the article DOES include some rather substantial coverage.[1] and more is available. BUT as we have no confirmation of it completing WP:NFF is failed. Allow back when notability is more strongly established. Schmidt, Michael Q. 03:57, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete without prejudice on WP:TOOSOON grounds. It'll be notable at some point in the future, but not now. Not now. TomStar81 (Talk) 10:47, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Move to draft Since it will be notable at some point of time. SD0001 (talk) 07:24, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:34, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.