Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Early Registration

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 18:35, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The Early Registration

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non Notable website. Fails WP:GNG. Koala15 (talk) 02:24, 23 January 2015 (UTC). This music website is included into (and therefore meets the traffic, reliability, etc requirements for) Google News(See: https://www.google.com/webhp?sourceid=chrome-instant&ion=1&espv=2&ie=UTF-8#tbm=nws&q=site:theearlyregistration.com). Pigeons and Planes has cited The Early Registration. (See: http://pigeonsandplanes.com/2014/09/watch-kanye-wests-surprise-performance-at-chicagos-aahh-festival/). OkayPlayer has cited The Early Registration. (See: http://www.okayplayer.com/news/common-jay-electronica-kanye-west-aahh-fest-video.html). The Early Registration's reviews are often cited on Wikipedia album articles, and having a wikipedia page for The ER is in the reader's best interests.[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. ^BE _CK ^Y _SA ^{Y L}E _S 06:10, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. ^BE _CK ^Y _SA ^{Y L}E _S 06:10, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. ^BE _CK ^Y _SA ^{Y L}E _S 06:10, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 00:51, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - It probably could have been deleted under CSD A7. There do not seem to be any independent sources that discuss the website in any depth. Fails WP:WEBCRIT.- Mr X 01:42, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.