Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Donner Party
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 17:05, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The Donner Party
- The Donner Party (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Can't find RS for this article Weaponbb7 (talk) 04:24, 4 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. There's a biography and discography in Martin C. Strong's The Great Indie Discography (3 albums released), a review in SPIN, an entry in the Trouser Press Record Guide, reviews in The Stranger, PopMatters, Allmusic ([1], [2]) and New York Press, an Allmusic biography, and various other mentions in relation to Coomes' later bands ([3], [4], [5], [6]).--Michig (talk) 06:35, 4 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:17, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Satisfies WP:MUSIC criteria 1 (per the sources above) and 6 (band includes notable musician Sam Coomes. Article could, however, use a cleanup. Doc StrangeMailboxLogbook 03:35, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:21, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - I am old enough to recall the band, which was a one-hit wonder. Bearian (talk) 17:44, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: The article under discussion here has been flagged for {{rescue}} by the Article Rescue Squadron. SnottyWong converse 15:13, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak keep - Sources provided above appear to establish notability, although they need to be added to the article. The article itself needs to be cleaned up and checked for copyvios (because it reads like one). SnottyWong converse 15:13, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.