Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Dark History of Uchiha: The Bloodline of Tengu

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 10:35, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Dark History of Uchiha: The Bloodline of Tengu

With the exception of using a personalized reason for speedy deletion, I don't think I could do my usual tagging of this article as "unremarkable". Anyway, this article is complete and utter fan fiction that some members of the Naruto community have come to hold as gospel. The only factual part of the entire article is that some of the characters mentioned actually exist, though what the article says they've done and how they are all connected is bogus. Falls under Wikipedia:No original research, Wikipedia:Fancruft, Wikipedia:Notability (fiction), and so on. ~Snapper T o 02:55, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Certainly I agree with the Delete, but unremarkable is not given as one of the reasons for a Speedy.DGG 05:24, 24 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I was referring to criteria A7, "unremarkable people, groups, companies and web content." ~Snapper T o 05:27, 24 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete — As fancruft. Philippe Beaudette 04:34, 23 March 2007 (UTC) Philippe Beaudette 04:34, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
A rasen-shuriken to the article (Speedy delete) Completely original research; saw this on Narutofan forum under THEORY section, which means completely unproven stuff. I may need to check out if seeing this is another pointless theory war that attempt to insert credibility to they argument. I may like Naruto, but this is just completely ridiculous. George Leung 06:08, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, can't see what CSD criteria this would fit under. Still, as fanfic, this is original research and has no reliable sources, effectively failing WP:A. And per WP:FICT, fanfiction and fan theories are not notable. NeoChaosX (talk, walk) 07:24, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete "This is a Theory and may contain spoilers" <- That pretty much says it all right there. Original Research. Wait until we get enough votes to WP:SNOWBALL this and then do so. Cheers, Lankybugger ○ speak ○ see ○ 14:51, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - How has this managed to stay up for ten whole days without being AfD'd? Iridescenti 18:04, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Did you see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ben Bitdiddle? The article has been around since 2003, and we are only now getting around to discussing nuking it. — Tuvok[^T@lk/_{Improve me}] 22:21, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

People search this on Narutofan forum, not in this site. Plus, only extreme Uchiha-tards will like this theory. George Leung 19:42, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete "This is a theory"? There we are, WP:OR. — Tuvok[^T@lk/_{Improve me}] 22:17, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fanfic, the end. JuJube 00:13, 24 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as both copied content and complete nonsense. — Someguy0830 (T | C) 06:01, 24 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Looks to be copied, very long, not Wikified, put me to sleep. Realkyhick 07:15, 24 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. patent nonsense DaveApter 16:59, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.