Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Cultureship

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. --MelanieN (talk) 01:16, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The Cultureship

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:ORG, especially WP:ORGDEPTH. I am struggling to find anything more than passing mentions in any independent sources. Edwardx (talk) 22:17, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD cannot be processed correctly because of an issue with the header. Please make sure the header has only 1 article, and doesn't have any HTML encoded characters.—^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 22:22, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: I think that I've fixed the technical code issues now! Edwardx (talk) 22:26, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Human3015^TALK 23:25, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Human3015^TALK 23:26, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete for now as searches found nothing and that's not surprising. Notifying taggers Sionk and Shawn in Montreal. SwisterTwister talk 05:54, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 07:36, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, now it's come to AfD. To be honest it's a bit harsh to measure a charitable, community organisation against WP:CORPDEPTH. All the same, the events supported by The Cultureship get far more coverage than The Cultureship itself. I also find it somewhat confusing, the Telegraph] says The Cultureship is actaully a ship, rather than an organisation. Maybe an article about its founders, Zatorski and Zatorski, would have more chance of success. Sionk (talk) 18:26, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.