Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Con Simulator

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 20:29, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The Con Simulator

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find video game sources: "The Con Simulator" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · TWL · NYT · WP reference · VG/RS · VG/RL · WPVG/Talk)

Promotional article and fails WP:NOT. No context for notability. Fails WP:GNG scope_creep^Talk 02:50, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. — HELLKNOWZ ▎TALK 12:36, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete (unless foreign language sources are vetted) as a non-notable video game failing WP:GNG with no multiple reliable independent in-depth sources, such as WP:VG/RS. IndieGames looks okayish though. chuapp looks extensive, but I don't know anything about the site. — HELLKNOWZ ▎TALK 12:41, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Seems like a case of a possible WP:TOOSOON. I also found https://www.bleedingcool.com/2018/05/05/like-conventions-cash-con-simulator/ but it is not a WP:SIGCOV source to count as well as the Chuapp one (overall the game itself does not seem to be the primary focus of the article and stays as a passing mention). At this state it sadly fails WP:GNG. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 19:50, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.