Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Complete Works

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. -- Scott Burley (talk) 07:38, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The Complete Works (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:DICDEF --woodensuperman 09:01, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 09:02, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. I found it easy to add a scholarly fact on the topic, using Google Books. Charles Matthews (talk) 09:13, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 11:00, 19 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment, is this more appropriate for Wiktionary? Coolabahapple (talk) 11:02, 19 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per WP:NOTDIC, specifically the fact that there is no single topic here but a number of different things that share a label. The article is not about "complete works" as a concept in, say, publishing or taxonomy. Nor is it about the phrase the complete works as such. It is about complete editions of Shakespeare, Bach, Euler, etc. Cnilep (talk) 04:07, 25 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.