Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The City of Pleasure
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Ryan PostlethwaiteSee the mess I've created or let's have banter 22:44, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
- The City of Pleasure (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable novel. Can't find any reliable sources. Article's provided "quotes" as reviews aren't sourced. Fails WP:NBOOKS. Mikeblas (talk) 14:15, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Egypt-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:59, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:59, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
- Delete - Not Notable. Sinai Horus 〉〉〉 00:01, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
- Comment: It looks like all of the coverage for this book would be in Arabic, so I'm going to ask around to see if anyone can help with searching for sources. I can do some searching with Google Translate, but it's understandably flawed. I can find some mention of it here and there with sources like this one, but GT isn't really helping overly much. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 13:30, 11 July 2014 (UTC)
- Barring any Arabic fluent editors coming in and providing sources, I'd argue that if this closes as a redirect it should redirect with history. I figure that if we leave the history intact, we can always un-redirect this if Arabic language sources are found after the AfD closes. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 13:33, 11 July 2014 (UTC)
- Keep - Tokyogirl79, it appear that the notability can mostly be confirmed by Arabic sources. Youm7 [1] and Al Bayan [2] discussed the book, and so did As-Safir [3] but to a lesser extent. It was also mentioned/described by other Arab publishers, such as Al-Ahram [4] [5] [6] [7] [8], Sky News Arabia [9], Al Arabiya [10], ِAl Akhbar [11], the English language Egypt Independent [12] and many others. Fitzcarmalan (talk) 10:56, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jenks24 (talk) 15:03, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
- The sources provided by Fitzcarmalan look legit, so I support keeping the article. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 10:22, 15 July 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.