Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Brewing Network (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Missvain (talk) 22:05, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The Brewing Network (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't have the coverage to meet WP:GNG or WP:ORG. Previous AfD attracted few people and ended in no consensus. Boleyn (talk) 14:29, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 14:35, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 14:35, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Note to closer for soft deletion: While this discussion appears to have no quorum, it is NOT eligible for soft deletion because it was previously discussed at AfD and the result was no consensus. --Cewbot (talk) 00:02, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Previous discussions: 2010-06 no consensus

Related discussions: 2010-06 Pagan hooligans ✗ delete

• Delete came over all thirsty parsing through the links, but it's not WP:GNG. Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 09:13, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete fails to meet the WP:GNG. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 05:20, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.