Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Bourne Betrayal (2016 film)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Article might be recreated under its proper name in the future when WP:NFF is met. Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 19:03, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The Bourne Betrayal (2016 film)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The film has no release date or title, and has not entered production. So this article is basically a hoax. Koala15 (talk) 23:07, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Only one source? Come on, we need more sources. Delete. CookieMonster755 (talk) 00:00, 7 January 2015 (UTC)CookieMonster755[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Everymorning talk 23:58, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per the fact that one redirect already exists. Does not qualify as a WP:HOAX as there is enough reporting that the studio "wants" to make the film. Whether that happens or not is a WP:CRYSTAL situation. FAR TOO SOON also applies. If it isn't deleted ~~then it should certainly be redirected to Bourne (film series)#Future and~~ any useful WPRSed info should be added there. MarnetteD|Talk 00:12, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:44, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Bourne (film series)#Future or Delete. It's not a hoax. However, it seems to have been put on hold. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 03:06, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Question of procedure for the closing admin. Per the link provided by NRP showing that the film may not get a 2016 release. Is it better to delete the article now or come back and delete the article/redirect when a release year is confirmed? MarnetteD|Talk 16:21, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  - Now that you've raised that question, I just realized that the excessive disambiguation is unnecessary. The Bourne Betrayal (film) already exists as a redirect, which makes this one redundant (and not very useful if it won't even have a 2016 release). Since any release date is now speculative at best, I'd say it should just be deleted. I'll adjust my vote accordingly. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 23:06, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    - Thanks for doing the research on this NinjaRobotPirate I will adjust mine as well. MarnetteD|Talk 23:38, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:CRYSTAL and the information provided by NinjaRobotPirate. Egsan Bacon (talk) 19:29, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.