Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Bludgeon Brothers

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 03:19, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Bludgeon Brothers

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't meet WP:GNG. No significant coverage in reliable independent sources. Notability not inherited from The Wyatt Family (where most of the article is copied from). Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. Nikki♥311 03:58, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions. Nikki♥311 03:58, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete topic should be a redirect. Lee Vilenski(talk) 06:51, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Screw it I changed my mind just delete it. No Redirect either. SSGeorgie (talk) 07:43, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I explained in this link the reasons to keep it. AdamSawyer(talk) 16:41, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It's useful is not a valid keep argument. Nikki♥311 17:08, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete more notable as part of the Wyatt Family than without them. Nickag989^talk 19:05, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Another possibility is to make an addition to the separation section of the Wyatt Family article and redirect this article to that section until the new team is independently notable.--67.68.21.146 (talk) 23:10, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete not independently notable.LM2000 (talk) 08:29, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.