Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Block (Milwaukee Bucks)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 12:49, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The Block (Milwaukee Bucks)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:CONTENTFORK of 2021 NBA Finals. A standlone page with a title that is WP:RECENTISM fandom at this point, and mostly using a single play as a WP:COATRACK to rehash a game and a series already covered by the Finals page. Generic, fabricated term is not suitable as a redirect either. WP:TOOSOON to determine the legacy of this one play. —Bagumba (talk) 07:41, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Basketball-related deletion discussions. —Bagumba (talk) 07:41, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep LeBron James's block of Andre Iguidala in Game 7 of the 2016 NBA Finals has it's own article.—Michiganwolverines2014 (talk) 14:01, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pointing out that other articles exist is not a valid argument in AFD debates. And even so, a Google search of "The Block" "Giannis Antetokounmpo" only has about 20% of the results of a similar search of "The Block" "LeBron James". And most of the first page of results on the Antetokounmpo search are routine coverage that simply describe this blockas any other block (e.g. the first two results are "a video... showing every angle of the block." and "explained how he was able to react so quickly and get the block.") Frank Anchor^Talk 14:38, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Most of this content is already found in 2021 NBA Finals and very little reliable non-routine coverage exists on this block. Frank Anchor^Talk 14:40, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Arizona-related deletion discussions. Frank Anchor^Talk 14:43, 26 July 2021 (UTC) [reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Wisconsin-related deletion discussions. Frank Anchor^Talk 14:43, 26 July 2021 (UTC) [reply]

Delete As non-notable content fork. Not much can be written about the block itself anyway. ~EDDY ^{(talk/contribs)}~ 01:56, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.