Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Best Sex Ever

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The case was not made that a redirect is within policy or desirable due to how common the phrase is. Guerillero ^{Parlez Moi} 13:43, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Best Sex Ever

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No sourcing found in a WP:BEFORE. Found only false positives using the phrase "best sex ever" unrelated contexts. Deprodded for no reason. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 17:28, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 17:28, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:58, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:59, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. I checked and the editor who removed the PROD did so with the summary "Removed Proposed deletion/dated tag: "unlikely to have sources" not quite good enough for PROD, let's check". So, your assertion that it was "Deprodded for no reason." is yet another made up rationale in one of your AfD nominations. DonaldD23 talk to me 18:20, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails WP:GNG. Aside from routine entries in IMDb and the like, searches yield only incidental mentions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:32, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, RL0919 (talk) 22:29, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to List of Cinemax original programming#Max After Dark as WP:CHEAP. Getting real tired of WP:ATDs never being considered for obvious gimmes like this show. Nate • (chatter) 22:58, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Nate, A significant portion of our WP:PRODs are of this nature. You can help by joining WP:PRODPATROL. ~Kvng (talk) 13:23, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The phrase "the best sex ever" is a common cliché. It is too generic as a useful search term for a certain company's content. • Gene93k (talk) 12:24, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete due to subject's distinct lack of verifiable independent notability per WP:NTV, which is essentially WP:GNG. Material that is poorly sourced, or not sourced at all, does not get dumped elsewhere in Wikipedia; it is deleted. -The Gnome (talk) 20:11, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - nobody is going to be looking for this article with a search title like that. (As for what they are looking for, answers on a postcard....) Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 11:08, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to List of Cinemax original programming#Max After Dark per Nate. Bookworm857158367 (talk) 13:26, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.