Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Association of Licentiates of Medical Council of Hong Kong (ALMCHK)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Sandstein 13:27, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The Association of Licentiates of Medical Council of Hong Kong (ALMCHK) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not meet Notability requirement SCP-2000 09:52, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Hong Kong-related deletion discussions. SCP-2000 09:52, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:01, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:01, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:01, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Respectable well-established medical association. 28 references. Some to their own website, but very unlikely that it is not notable. Rathfelder (talk) 07:22, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• No judgment on independent notability, but editorially, this might be covered better under an article called "Medical licensing in Hong Kong." If this results in anything but "delete" or "keep," does anyone want to write such an article, then start a merger discussion with the goal of turning this article title into a redirect? davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 13:34, 17 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Note on the Article for creation banner on the talk page was: The page was moved into the main encyclopedia by the author, 59khcmla, with this edit. Later, UnitedStatesian, an AFC reviewer (reviewer list as of that edit) put an AFC WikiProject banner on the article's talk page with this edit. Articles which go through the AFC process and which are moved into the main encyclopedia by an AFC reviewer normally have at least a slight presumption that the reviewer who moves the page has reviewed it. Unless UnitedStatesian gives his input, there is no way to know if this review was done. Sidebar: I realize the use of {{U}} may look like WP:CANVASSING and, technically, it may be canvassing. I thought hard about leaving them out, but it is only fair to alert both editors that I am raising this issue. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 13:52, 17 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.