Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thanks To...

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 02:21, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks To...

A single level in a computer game. No claim in article of notability for this particular level. Prod contested ~~without comment~~. (comment on prod is on article talk page) Fabrictramp | talk to me 15:39, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Game-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 15:39, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or Merge with game's article - No point in having an entire article on one level. _David ^WS _(contribs) 15:45, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletions. MrKIA11 (talk) 15:48, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and Merge - Total WP:GAMECRUFT. I don't see the need for a redirect... not likely search term for a "level of a game".--Pmedema (talk) 16:47, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and Merge with game's article - Although it is quite a detailed article it doesn't deserve its own page. Nintendofootball (talk) 17:04, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete — Mostly fancruft that has no verifiable sources establishing anything (other Wikipedia articles are nowhere near reliable as references). Also note that delete and merge is not GFDL-compatible; the !vote should either be delete or merge, not both. MuZemike (talk) 17:42, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have souces! Under the reference section. Also, about merging, I don't think it's a bad idea. If anybody wants this, I would like to discuss how it is handeled. Also, this level is very special. That's why I think it should have it's own article. You could make a article about a level, and I wouldn't nominate it for deletion, a long as it had sufficient information and had sources. Everysubjectman

Delete - Particular game aspect which has not been the subject of reliable coverage. I have removed the references to self-published sites per WP:Reliable sources, interested parties are welcome to check the history to review them. Marasmusine (talk) 10:38, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.